New Jersey's Special Education Segregation: Why the State Leads in Separate Schooling

Why Does New Jersey Lead in Segregating Students With Disabilities?
Introduction: A Troubling Trend in Special Education
What if nearly half of all students with disabilities in your state attended separate schools? How would this impact their social development and academic progress? Why does New Jersey send more children with disabilities to segregated schools than any other state in the U.S.? These questions lie at the heart of a critical examination of special education practices in the Garden State.
According to a Hechinger Report investigation, New Jersey stands out for its unusually high rate of placing students with disabilities in separate educational environments. While inclusion has become the national standard, New Jersey continues to maintain a system where 43% of students with disabilities attend separate schools—far exceeding the national average of 13%.
The Legal Framework: IDEA and Inclusion Mandates
The Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) requires that students with disabilities be educated in the least restrictive environment (LRE) possible. This means they should learn alongside non-disabled peers to the maximum extent appropriate. However, New Jersey's interpretation and implementation of this federal law differ significantly from other states.
For example, Massachusetts—a state with similar demographics and resources—only sends about 20% of students with disabilities to separate schools. The stark contrast raises questions about New Jersey's approach to special education funding, district policies, and cultural attitudes toward disability inclusion.
Funding Incentives and Systemic Barriers
How Money Shapes Placement Decisions
New Jersey's unusual funding structure creates financial incentives for districts to place students in separate schools. The state reimburses districts for 90% of tuition costs at private special education schools, while providing much less support for inclusive programs in public schools.
Consider the case of a hypothetical student named Alex with autism spectrum disorder. A local district might spend $25,000 annually to educate Alex in an inclusive setting with supports. However, if placed in a private special education school, the state would cover $45,000 of the $50,000 tuition—making it financially attractive for the district despite being more restrictive.
The Impact on Students and Families
Social Isolation vs. Specialized Support
Proponents argue that separate schools provide intensive services that general education settings cannot match. For students with complex needs like multiple disabilities or severe behavioral challenges, specialized environments may offer necessary therapies and trained staff.
However, research consistently shows that students in inclusive settings demonstrate better academic outcomes, improved social skills, and higher post-school employment rates. The story of Maria, a New Jersey parent who fought for years to get her son with Down syndrome into a general education classroom, illustrates the emotional toll of these battles.
Alternative Models: What Other States Do Differently
States like Florida and Indiana have successfully increased inclusion rates through:
- Weighted funding formulas that reward inclusive placements
- Professional development for general education teachers
- Strong oversight of LRE compliance
- Peer-mentoring programs
Minnesota's 'Inclusion in the Least Restrictive Environment' initiative reduced segregated placements by 15% in five years through targeted grants and technical assistance to districts.
Path Forward: Recommendations for Change
To address this issue, experts suggest New Jersey could:
- Reform the funding system to remove incentives for restrictive placements
- Invest in co-teaching models and universal design for learning
- Increase parent awareness of inclusion rights
- Collect and publish school-level inclusion data
A pilot program in Union County demonstrates what's possible—by reallocating resources, the district increased inclusive placements by 30% while maintaining service quality.